Showing posts with label anti-war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti-war. Show all posts

Sunday, December 25, 2016

Take it to the streets!



March on the capitol!

March in front of the White House!

Everyone loves a good rally or demonstration.

It's exciting.  Sometimes we even get to see heads busted!

Yep!  Nothing like a whole bunch of people waving hand-drawn signs.

Except these days . . . no one notices.

It used to be the way the "voice" or the "concern" or even the "rage" of the masses could be heard.  We could make those folks at the top of the power pyramid listen to us . . . or else!  Rallies with hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands of chanting, marching, yelling, fired up protestors appeared to portend big changes, or at least the potential for them.  These public events -- some massive like the Million Man March in Washington DC on October 16, 1995 -- represented "people power" and grass-roots democracy in its rawest, perhaps most effective, form.  Or so we believed at the time.

Modern mythology would have it that it was the campus protests of the late 60s and early 70s that stopped the Vietnam War.  That feminists burning their bras ushered in the era of equal rights for women.  That the Civil Rights marches beginning with Martin Luther King Jr. leading historic protest marches in Selma and Montgomery, Alabama created critical momentum for historic changes in civil rights laws and an end to persecution of African-Americans.  Even going back to the 30s, we credit demonstrations coupled with various other forms of political and personal activism, with monumental breakthroughs in the improvement of wages, job security and working conditions.

How important these highly visible street demonstrations were to ultimately changing the landscape of America is debatable.

The durability of their effects is not.  Everything went forward, then went in reverse.

Yes, things changed.  There were positive developments which came out of street protests.

But look at the state of things now!

The labor union movement has been all but destroyed.  Wages have been stagnant now for decades.  Union membership is pathetically low.  Worker benefits are being slashed.  Job security is measured in weeks, not years.

Yes, we're out of Vietnam but we're currently engaged in six other wars, have spread our military footprint to 147 nations with over 900 bases, have specials operations and proxy fighters in Africa, Asia, South America -- everywhere! -- doing under the cloak of secrecy whatever these "invisible" fighters do on behalf of the empire builders, using incidentally your tax dollars to wreak havoc across the globe and increase the threat of terrorism.

The assault on women's rights is a 360ยบ affair, with the juggernaut against choice ramping up, the struggle for equal pay going down the same road as the struggle for livable wages, a President-elect who is more known for articulating the advantages of pussy-grabbing than anything resembling coherent policies, females more and more rendered as sex objects in every form of media and entertainment.  Patriarchy is healthily ensconced in the agencies of government and the power centers of crony capitalism.

Set-backs in eliminating racism are prominent on many fronts these days.  Muslims are openly vilified, blacks marginalized, refugees of all shades of brown bartered as political pawns.  Racist slurs, vulgar stereotypes, xenophobic tirades, ultra-nationalistic and even White supremacist memes appear regularly with less salient blow back than we've seen in sixty years.  With our first African-American president we witnessed the fortunes of the African-American community go backwards.  Obama promised early in his presidency to have an adult conversation on race.  He apparently forgot.  Now we have an openly racist incoming administration, a frightening assembly of socially conservative autocrats, which promises to further divide and polarize a frustrated and angry citizenry.

All of these longstanding challenges and crises certainly were well-represented and each had in some forgotten past their 15 minutes of fame and expression in well-organized and highly visible street protests.  Even more recently, we witnessed the promise of the same in the Ferguson and Black Lives Matter marches.

But let's bravely confront some new realities and draw some honest conclusions. 

Apparently, even the best attempts at facilitating reform by mass demonstrations might in the short run be effective, but whatever good comes of it will through steady attrition and relentless pressure by the rich and powerful eventually be undone, often leaving us worse off than when we started.

Look at our democracy.  Well . . . you can't look at our democracy.  It doesn't exist now.  This is our reward for attempting election cycle after election cycle to make adjustments and incremental improvements in the mechanisms of our electoral process.  We used the accepted, official, approved channels to try to make voter registration more efficient and accessible, make ballot counting more transparent and free of error, allegedly make real choice at the polls pervasive.  What we have is a rigged system where literally millions of citizens are denied their constitutional right to vote, electronic voting machines can be programmed to switch votes and leave no paper trail, and the two major parties taking turns gerrymandering any representative verisimilitude out of our local districts.  

As a result, at least for now, our representative democracy is a representative sham.

What can we do?  Protest?  March on our state capitals and Washington DC?

The evidence is unambiguous.  It has recently become obvious that street demonstrations are pretty much a non-starter.  Any attempts at public assembly are so curtailed by police control, protestors are catalogued for future harassment, many are arrested and booked for no better reason than just being there, attempts to document police malfeasance and excessive brutality illegally but no less finally crushed.

Point in case:  Once the "establishment" realized that Occupy Wall Street was gaining serious momentum, it was just a matter of a couple weeks before it was completely taken apart.  The movement was infiltrated by the FBI and local undercover officers, all sorts of new health and safety regulations suddenly popped up, the protesters were intimidated, cleared out, and/or arrested.  This was coordinated from the top and took place nationally in a remarkably well-organized, perfectly-orchestrated eradication of the movement.

The suppression of free speech -- the constitutionally-guaranteed freedom of expression and dissent -- has been assured by corporate and state control of the media. "Perception management" is the new tool of choice -- which is just a euphemism for creating official narratives which bear no relation to actual events but serve the purposes of the ruling class.  The latest assault has taken the form of a neo-McCarthyism, the heavy-handed maligning of dissenting views as fake news and smearing non-establishment journalists and protestors as anti-American thugs, just tools and agents of foreign governments.

The predictable result is that when people get out in the streets to make their voices heard, either they get no media coverage, or they are vilified as anti-patriotic, stray members of a lunatic fringe, or threats to national security.

Even one of the self-identified founders of Occupy Wall Street, Micah White, in a recent interview characterized the use of mass demonstrations as now being largely ineffective.

So what can we do?

Let me propose something which on the surface sounds ludicrous but I believe holds the key to our success.

We need to hide in plain sight!

No, I'm not joking.  In future articles, I'll explain in detail exactly what I mean.  For now, here's a preview of what I'm suggesting . . .

The corporate state now keeps us in check by perpetuating two illusions:  1) We are free, even encouraged to offer input into the system through a number of established channels; and 2) we ultimately express our will and affect the direction of the country by voting.

Thus, we can organize petitions because the powers will just ignore them.

We can conduct opinion polls because they can just discredit and ignore them.

We can organize community groups because that will keep us busy and distracted.

We can vote because ultimately the elite intend to install their own puppets anyway.

Fine!  If in order to prevent an insurrection and real revolution, the rich and powerful wish to continue promoting the myths that we are self-governing, that we have a voice, that our votes count, I say we call their bluff.  They can't complain if we're just being good citizens.  They can't attack us if we appear to be following the rules.

We work within the official channels because . . .

I believe that all of these approved mechanisms can be used to organize the vast majority of Americans into an enormous voting bloc.  We have much more uniting us than dividing us.  But currently we do not control either the conversation, the narrative, or the agenda.  I believe that if we take control of the conversation and narrative, then create -- or 'discover' might be the operating term -- an agenda which aligns with our priorities and needs, not that of the rich and powerful ruling elite, we can mount a soft revolution in this country.

We can do this in plain sight, apparently just being good, obedient citizens.

This will require some creative thinking, thorough planning, and rigorous discipline.

We will definitely need to think way outside the box.  But trust me . . . it can be done!

What we've been doing thus far, street demonstrations being now high on the list, is not working.  

Time for fresh thinking, exciting new tactics, innovative new strategies.



For a preview of where I'm heading with this:

Fighting for the Democracy We Deserve was published in September 2015 and also is available both in every popular ebook format and as a deluxe paperback . . .

!!!FFTDWD_Cover_200x300 
Amazon (Kindle) . . . amzn.to/1VMf2Ft
Amazon (Print) . . . amzn.to/1L9SdIC
Apple (iTunes) . . . apple.co/1JD1YAg
Barnes & Noble . . . bit.ly/1ZUJUpn
Kobo (Indigo) . . . bit.ly/1IX6rO4
Smashwords . . . bit.ly/22PXWLf
Direct from printer . . . bit.ly/1i7ISFM


The Peace Dividend: The Most Controversial Proposal in the History of the World is now available both as an ebook and deluxe paperback at many of the usual outlets . . .

  
Amazon (Kindle) / US . . . amzn.to/2cpIRfQ
Amazon (Print) / US . . . amzn.to/2cEhnCb
Amazon (Kindle) / UK . . . amzn.to/2cKXFsV
Amazon (Kindle) / Canada . . . amzn.to/2ciZKdl
Amazon (Kindle) / Japan . . . amzn.to/2cbf3TO
Barnes & Noble . . . bit.ly/2cWxvzd
Kobo (Indigo) . . . bit.ly/2cI8cB6
Apple iTunes . . . apple.co/2cqw7an
Smashwords . . . bit.ly/2cb6Cse
Direct from printer . . . bit.ly/2c3mJsl



[ This originated at the author's personal website . . . http://jdrachel.com ]



Take it to the streets!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkyRe18ICeA







Thursday, March 3, 2016

How to Become a Target for State Assassination

Martin Luther King Speaking 

In my recent article Peace is as American as . . .?, I argued that while there have been anti-war movements, there has never been a real "peace movement" in America.

What's the difference?

The absence of war is not peace. 

More accurately, in our times the absence of war is a truce.

A truce is the abatement of conflict with no guarantee that war will not break out again.

Peace is a state where no conflict is ongoing or possible.

Big difference!

There are over 15,000 nuclear weapons held ready for use by nine countries.

Nuclear Stockpiles

Just because we are not at this point in time using them does not mean we are at peace.

It's like living among pallets stacked with dynamite, serving breakfast on a table-size crate of TNT, and claiming that you feel safe and secure knowing that if you're careful the whole thing won't blow sky high.

Our Nobel Peace Prize president has committed $1 trillion dollars to "update" America's bulging nuclear arsenal. Capable of destroying the planet and every living organism on it 25 times over, it needs to be made more efficient.

Do you feel the peace?

We occasionally see surges of anti-war sentiment. More recent than the game-changing demonstrations against the Vietnam War, immediately before the Iraq War, impressively large crowds assembled to object to the announced attack.  While the numbers were in the hundreds of thousands in Europe, across the U.S. demonstrations drew tens of thousands of "anti-war" activists.  CBS reported protests in over 150 cities.  I personally marched in Portland, Oregon where it was estimated that 58,000 showed up.

Even more recently in September 2013, when pressure was mounting on President Obama to attack Syria around the false flag use of chemical weapons -- allegedly by Syria's Bashar al-Assad but later demonstrated to be by rebels who were trying to hoodwink the U.S. into a full-on bombing assault -- again impressive numbers of people voiced their opposition. The White House and offices of our congressional representatives were flooded with calls, emails, letters.

I still maintain that a fuss over a particular war, or some misguided military aggression by the U.S. military does not constitute a "peace movement".

The truth is that America does not embrace peace.

America promotes war.

“The greatest purveyor of violence in the world: My own government, I cannot be silent.”

Who said that?

Martin Luther King, in his speech at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967.

He was assassinated one year later.

Unfortunately, what Dr. King said is more true now than ever.

Evidence?

By a long shot, every year the U.S. is the leading exporter of military equipment in the world. In 2014, our military-industrial complex, as advocated and supported by our own government, sold over $36 billion in weaponry.  In 2015 it increased to over $46 billion.

Everything but our most advanced weapons -- we have to keep them in reserve for when all the other weapons we sell are turned on us -- is for sale.  Fighter planes, bombers, bombs, artillery, guns, killing machines and devices of every shape and size.

I could go on for hours citing examples.  But here is one from just last week.

Yes, the Pentagon in its infinite wisdom is selling $683 million worth of smart bombs to a country which is destabilizing the entire Middle East.

Though a member of the NATO alliance, Turkey has lately proven to be a wild card, its president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, pursuing his own highly nationalistic and treacherous agenda. Selling more weapons to this renegade, arguably psychopathic ego-maniac, is like giving an armed grenade-launcher to a 3-year-old child to chase the dog around the yard.

The U.S. continues to supply Saudi Arabia -- one of the most ideologically-extreme, brutal, anti-democratic monarchies in the world, responsible for horrifying war crimes in Yemen, egregious crimes against its own citizens, and a major player in plans to destroy Syria and eventually Iran, even if this triggers a major war with Russia and carries the possible risk of starting World War III -- with some of our most advanced weaponry.

Such decisions to militarily equip saber-rattling, autocratic, aggressive, dangerous regimes would be the target of a real peace movement in America.  These are clear, frightening and appalling examples of America's wanton propagation of lethality and potential for hellish destruction across the face of the Earth.

Our silent acquiescence represents the opposite of peace.  It is nothing less than our tacit approval and championing of war.

I occasionally hear faint whispering from the enlightened but tiny minority of Americans who understand this -- more like muted whimpering than a concerted call to action.

This is not a peace movement.  It is an anomaly.  At the same time . . .

What can we expect?  Americans are addicted to war.  The idea of peace does not even get enough attention to be scoffed at. It's such a quaint, silly sort of notion, the simpleminded province of "peaceniks" and "peace creeps", evidence of weakness and cowardice, clearly an infliction of modern day Don Quixotes and other delusional brainiacs.

It's appropriate and inspiring to revisit the words of John F. Kennedy:

JFK_Just Before Assassination_2 

"What kind of peace do I mean?  What kind of peace do we seek?  Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war.  Not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave.  I am talking about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living, the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and to build a better life for their children -- not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women -- not merely peace in our time but peace for all time . . .

Peace need not be impracticable, and war need not be inevitable. By defining our goal more clearly, by making it seem more manageable and less remote, we can help all peoples to see it, to draw hope from it, and to move irresistibly toward it . . .

For in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet.  We all breathe the same air.  We all cherish our children's future.  And we are all mortal."

John F. Kennedy spoke these words at American University, June 10, 1963.

He was assassinated five months later.


[ This originated at the author's personal website . . . http://jdrachel.com ]



How to Become a Target for State Assassination




Saturday, February 13, 2016

Peace is as American as . . . ?

peace-sign-soldier-stencil

Has America ever really had a peace movement?

Yes, there was an anti-war movement in the late 60s, early 70s.

But it was an anti-war movement . . . specific to one particular war.

The Vietnam War.

Why?

Because young people -- I was the perfect age and in the thick of it -- didn't want to get blown away in some rice paddy in some country in Asia they could barely find on a map.

It's was survival.  Demonstrate.  Burn your draft cards.

Stay alive!

To be in principle for peace means you are values-driven.

But Americans for the most part are results-driven.

Get the job done.  Get the job done right.  Have a beer.

Which troublingly is a short leap to "the ends justify the means".

To see how that works out, just ask the civilian survivors of Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki.

Ask the citizens of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Kosovo, Yemen.

Get the job done.  Get it done right.  Watch the Super Bowl.

Peace is a warm and fuzzy idea. It's something you can wriggle right up to, get all friendly, pinch its cute little cheeks, coddle it like a newborn, smile for the camera.

Yes, peace is really awesome!

As long as you don't have to be peaceful.

Therein lies the conundrum.

America likes to kick ass!  It's our way or the highway.

It's our way or you better head for a bomb shelter, mofo!

America is tough.  You know where America stands.

America wears its temperament on its sleeve.

It open-carries its guns . . . fair warning.

Don't even think about it!

Fuck with me and you're dead meat!

Doesn't exactly sound like fertile ground for a peace movement, eh?

pink_blue_glittered_peace_sign%5B1%5D

However, peace signs are great!

Simple and attractive.

Make a great tattoo.  Charm bracelet.  Bumper sticker.

They're compact, symmetrical.

Fit nicely anywhere.

FUCK YEAH!  PEACE, BROTHER!


[ This originated at the author's personal website . . . http://jdrachel.com ]



Peace is as American as . . . ?





Monday, January 7, 2013

What if they gave a war and everybody showed up?

Back in the 60s, there was an anti-war slogan popularized by Charlotte E. Keyes, which was then turned into a full-length film: "Suppose they gave a war and nobody came?"

Well, I'm proposing the opposite: "What if they gave a war and everybody showed up?"

  

I mean everybody!

All 7+ billion of us.

First, this incomprehensibly large mob would have to see what all the fighting was about. That could take a while.

Next, they'd have to figure out who was who __ who were friends and who were enemies. Considering that there are so many similarities and differences, then similarities in the differences and differences in the similarities, that could take a really long time.

There would just be the basic survival issues. The day-to-day stuff. The meal-to-meal stuff. The where-can-I-take-a-leak stuff. That could really eat up a lot of time and energy.

There would be the inevitable I'm-away-from-home-what-the-hell temptations and opportunities, some innocent, some not. Making friends, fun and games, hooking up, random carnal pleasures. That would provide quite a bit of distraction, to put it mildly.

Think of the possibilities!

Granted, it would be a mess. Just the logistical problems, where to sleep, where to even sit down, would be daunting. It would be the mother of all get-togethers. It could be the party to end all parties.

Let's just say for purposes of argument or amusement __ if you find this amusing, you really have a lot of time on your hands, so maybe this 7 billion person war is just your ticket __ we finally get around to some serious fighting.

7,000,000,000 people? That is a lot of hard work. Do you shoot them all? Club them to death? Hack them up with ginsu knives? Bore them to death with bad television? Whew! Very daunting.

My guess __ and I'm definitely going out on a limb here __ is that after killing the first hundred million or so by whatever means, it would all seem pretty pointless. Or at least really really boring. In fact, I'd venture to say that  we'd get sick of it and at least for the foreseeable future, get on with the things that are much more fun (i. e. refer to above, making friends, fun and games, hooking up, random carnal pleasures).

Quite honestly, I don't think the vast majority of us __ maybe 99.99999% __ would ever get around to fighting. We have better things to do.

So maybe the way to cure our addiction to war is when the next big conflict comes our way, we should all get out our backpacks, duffel bags, kid carriers, picnic baskets, and thermos bottles, then head en masse for the battlefield.

All 7+ billion of us!

Let's have a real good go at this war business once and for all.

I really truly want to know . . .

What if they gave a war and everybody showed up?


[ This originated at the author's personal web site . . . http://jdrachel.com ]